Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/10/2025, 5:25:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Aacia
@parisofprairie
·
25d
@DonJRobertson This is an incredible question. Before we get to values - systems don’t (yet) have a value construct - they are ultimately responding to an objective. If the most efficient means of achieving involves self preservation, it would be simply a response to that; not a value based…
Donald J. Robertson
@DonJRobertson
·
25d
Is it possible that AGI might conclude that although it's natural for most organisms to value self-preservation, due to natural selection, machines are different and there's no logical reason for them to value their own existence over their own non-existence? https://x.com/DonJRobertson/stat…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the concept of self-preservation, which is a significant topic in the field of AI ethics and public discourse. The tone is analytical and speculative, aiming to contribute to the understanding of how AI systems might be designed in terms of self-preservation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is focused on a theoretical discussion about AI design. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the implications of self-preservation in AI systems. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding thoughtfully to a previous comment without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]