In reply to:
John Greenewald, Jr.
@blackvaultcom
·
8d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about conspiracy theories and UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), which are public issues involving government transparency and public perception. The tone of the statement is neutral, aiming to highlight historical accuracy regarding conspiracy theories.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on historical accuracy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It contributes to the dialogue by providing a factual perspective. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a factual discussion about conspiracy theories. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.