In reply to:
The statement and image suggest skepticism towards experts and imply that conspiracy theorists are more often correct. This engages with public discourse by challenging the credibility of experts and promoting alternative viewpoints.
- The statement may cause harm by undermining trust in experts, which can be detrimental to informed public discourse. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of experts by placing them in quotes, implying they are not genuine. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses expert opinions without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, as it mocks rather than critiques expert opinions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.