Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47

Score -36

The lack of water available to firefighters in Los Angeles was unavoidable, say experts and the media. Hydrants ran dry because the fires were just too big and the water system too old. Even if the large Santa Ynez reservoir had been filled with water, it likely would not have…

1/12/2025, 4:22:09 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

Had a massive water reservoir been online, it wouldn't have made much difference to LA firefighters, say the media. In fact, it would have made a massive difference. And now a whistleblower has come forward to say the reservoir should never have been drained in the first place.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of water availability for firefighting in Los Angeles, a significant public concern. It presents a perspective that aligns with expert opinions and media reports, suggesting that the lack of water was unavoidable due to the scale of the fires and the outdated water system. This contrasts with the claim in the conversation that a filled reservoir would have made a difference, supported by a whistleblower's statement.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm; it presents expert opinions and media reports without inflammatory language. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting expert opinions, though it contrasts with the whistleblower's claim, which could be seen as a challenge to the narrative. [+1]