Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by Jake Tapper constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the integrity of a public official and the implications for the Justice Department. The tone is critical and challenges the credibility of a nominee based on past actions.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the integrity of a public figure based on their past actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the individual by focusing on their public actions and statements rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by questioning the suitability of a nominee based on factual claims, encouraging scrutiny and accountability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the nominee's past actions and their implications for future responsibilities, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning a public figure's suitability for a public role, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.