Michael Schellenberger

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -17
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Had a massive water reservoir been online, it wouldn't have made much difference to LA firefighters, say the media. In fact, it would have made a massive difference. And now a whistleblower has come forward to say the reservoir should never have been drained in the first place.
1/12/2025, 6:40:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Part 3
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
As a new wave of fire and high winds threaten Los Angeles, the media is reporting that California’s elected leaders are not to blame and that right-wing influencers and Donald Trump are spreading misinformation and politicizing a tragedy. Racial and gender quotas through DEI…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
6d
Part 2
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
6d
For more than a decade, the media, Democrats, and Hollywood have told us that Western civilization in general and the United States in particular are white supremacist, genocidal, and unsustainable. The founding of America occurred not in 1776 but rather in 1619 with the…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
Over the next few weeks you’re going to hear Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Karen Bass, and the Democratic Party tell you that there’s nothing that could have been done to prevent the fires from destroying Los Angeles.

Those will be lies. They could have prevented them. Governor…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the accountability of public officials and media narratives regarding the management of resources and the prevention of fires in Los Angeles. It critiques political leaders and media for allegedly spreading misinformation and failing to prevent a disaster.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses public figures of lying and failing to prevent fires, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated with evidence. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the integrity of public officials and media, potentially impacting their dignity, but does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques actions and policies, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]