Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about misinformation related to public figures and their handling of a public issue, specifically the LA fires. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that Newsom and Bass are spreading misinformation, and it implies a call to action by providing 'receipts' or evidence to support the claim.
- The statement accuses public figures of spreading misinformation, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does challenge the dignity of the public figures involved by accusing them of misinformation without clear evidence in the statement itself. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a direct accusation without engaging in a discussion or providing a platform for rebuttal, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to challenge public figures, which is a legitimate use of free speech, but it should be done responsibly and with integrity, ensuring that accusations are well-founded.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.