In reply to:
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
1d
The statement is a reply to a conversation about a serious public issue involving legislative responses to sexual assault cases in prisons. The original conversation criticizes a legislator's response to a question about a male sexual assault, suggesting it prioritizes the offender's feelings over the victim's safety. The reply expresses incredulity and seems to support the criticism.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a critique of a potentially harmful policy.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but aligns with a critique of a policy that may lack these qualities.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but rather supports a critique of a policy.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by questioning policies. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.