Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/13/2025, 9:34:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Soares
@markkasaurus
·
24d
@GaryMarcus Clearly since they already took the donations meant to create a nonprofit public good, and converted it into a for profit. There is zero chance of shared profitability, which means shared prosperity is a mirage.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
24d
Horseshit. If they make a lot of money, they aren’t going to share. And they will likely destroy more jobs than they create.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
24d
OpenAI's economic blueprint: "shared prosperity is near"

The statement critiques the claim of 'shared prosperity' by suggesting it is misleading or false. It engages in public discourse by addressing the economic implications of AI development and corporate practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('lie') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but critiques a concept, thus respecting the privacy and dignity of individuals involved. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather dismisses the claim outright, which could be seen as lacking in constructive criticism. [-1]