Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement comments on a report by David Weiss, suggesting it is critical of the President and compares it to previous presidential actions. It engages with public issues related to political accountability and presidential conduct, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its critical nature could be seen as potentially harmful if not substantiated.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does critique a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and lacks constructive elements. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide evidence of constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but lacks responsibility and integrity if it does not provide evidence for its claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.