Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Blumenthal addresses concerns about the transparency and adequacy of a background check related to a public figure, which is a matter of public interest and accountability. The tone suggests a critique of the process and the involved parties, indicating a call for greater transparency and accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions but raises concerns about transparency.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on procedural issues rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of the process but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to address issues of public concern, aligning with the principles of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.