In reply to:
馃崜馃崜馃崜
@iruletheworldmo
路
24d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
24d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the reliability of AI-generated information in legal contexts. It critiques the use of AI by highlighting a case where an expert's credibility was questioned due to reliance on AI-generated sources. The tone is dismissive and sarcastic, suggesting that the issue could be easily resolved with proper knowledge.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies incompetence, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the person it addresses, as it mocks their understanding.聽[-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead resorts to sarcasm.聽[-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.