Andrew Yang

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the indictment of a public figure, Eric Adams, and discusses the implications for his political career and the city he governs.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as insensitive given the situation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be seen as lacking respect for Eric Adams' dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a dismissive tone towards Eric Adams' situation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead making a dismissive remark about Eric Adams' political future. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it focuses on a negative aspect without offering constructive solutions or insights. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its dismissive tone. [-1]