Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement involves a decision by Johnson regarding the handling of flags during a period of mourning, which touches on public protocol and respect for a deceased public figure. This decision can be seen as part of public discourse as it relates to civic practices and respect for national figures.
- The decision to raise flags on Inauguration Day could be seen as potentially disrespectful to the mourning period, which might be perceived as causing harm to those who value the tradition of honoring the deceased. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on the dignity of honoring a deceased public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it prioritizes the inauguration over the mourning period. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite dialogue or address potential disagreements with the decision.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The decision could be seen as using influence in a way that prioritizes one event over another, which may not be viewed as for the betterment of society by all. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement reflects a decision made by someone in a position of authority, which should be made with responsibility and integrity, but it may not align with everyone's view of respectful protocol.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.