Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes the UK Labour government's stance on copyright law and AI, suggesting there is no uncertainty in the law. It challenges the government's narrative and implies misinformation. The tone is assertive and accusatory, aiming to correct what the speaker perceives as a falsehood.
- The statement aims to correct perceived misinformation, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by clarifying public understanding. However, the accusatory tone may not fully align with this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of the government, which is a form of public discourse. However, it uses strong language ('lie'), which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.