Michael Schellenberger

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -17
1/15/2025, 5:44:00 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
Failure To Mobilize Firefighters Before L.A. Fires Began Led To Catastrophe, Says New Whistleblower

“We don’t have enough engines, and 100 were in the shop” says L.A. firefighter with 40 years of experience. "Lack of leadership" is the problem.

California’s governor and Los…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
Nothing could have been done to stop the catastrophic L.A. fires that killed 24, incinerated 12k homes, and cost $250B, say the media. Nonsense, says an LA firefighter. The failure by Newsom & Bass to mobilize firefighters before the fires began led to an avoidable catastrophe.

The statement and accompanying article engage in public discourse by addressing the response to the L.A. fires, highlighting potential failures in leadership and resource allocation. It critiques the actions of fire officials and government leaders, suggesting that the catastrophe could have been mitigated with better preparation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold officials accountable, potentially preventing future harm by advocating for better preparedness. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The critique respects privacy but challenges the actions of public officials, which is a legitimate aspect of public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on actions and decisions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By highlighting potential failures, the statement uses its platform to advocate for improved public safety measures. [+1]