Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
2d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by addressing the response to a significant public safety issue, the L.A. fires, and attributing blame to public officials. It critiques the actions of government leaders and suggests that the catastrophe was avoidable, which contributes to civic dialogue about accountability and emergency preparedness.
- The statement aims to highlight a failure in emergency response, potentially promoting accountability and improvement, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as critical of public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of public officials, which is constructive if based on evidence, but could be seen as a personal attack if not substantiated.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to potentially influence public opinion and policy regarding emergency response and leadership accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.