Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
Arvind Narayanan
@random_walker
·
26d
One thing that people tend to forget in arguments about the Bitter Lesson is the distinction between AI capability improvement and AI-based product development. When it comes to the latter, the Bitter Lesson has never been true, and it would be silly to suggest that it is. Think…
1/15/2025, 2:08:17 PM
X

The statement critiques the new OpenAI tasks feature, describing it as 'extremely brittle.' It is part of a broader discussion on AI capability and product development, referencing specific issues with the feature's beta version. The tone is critical, highlighting technical flaws and user experience problems.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight issues with the OpenAI feature, which could be seen as constructive criticism intended to prompt improvements. However, the use of 'shocker' and 'extremely brittle' could be perceived as sensationalist, potentially undermining the constructive intent.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the OpenAI feature, focusing on specific technical issues. While it does not engage in personal attacks, the language used could be more balanced to foster constructive dialogue. [-1]