In reply to:
Insurrection Barbie
@DefiyantlyFree
·
2d
The statement is a supportive reply to a conversation about a public issue, specifically the failures in handling fires in Los Angeles. It acknowledges the analysis provided by Michael Shellenberger and the whistleblower's account, which are relevant to public safety and governance.
- The statement does not cause harm and supports a discussion on improving public safety. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging a thorough analysis of the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and supports constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By supporting the analysis, the statement uses influence to highlight important public safety issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.