The statement addresses a political issue concerning actions in the Minnesota House, suggesting it is a public discourse about democratic processes and governance. The tone is assertive, supporting a specific political stance and action taken by state representatives.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it uses strong language to describe the situation as a 'dangerous attack on democracy.'Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by supporting actions taken to protect democracy, though it is partisan in nature. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite dialogue with those in disagreement either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a political stance aimed at protecting democratic processes, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly address a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.