Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/16/2025, 12:59:47 AM
X
In reply to:
MindMirror
@TheMysteryDrop
·
176d
@GaryMarcus @sama So the “wall” is now reliability and not raw capabilities?

Feels like the intuitive way to interpret “hitting a wall” is that capabilities are slowing, which is clearly false if you look at o1/o3.

Unless your argument is that reliability is the intrinsic limiter.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
176d
Dear @sama,

Say what you said to Adam Grant it to my face. Debate me.

I coined the phrase “deep learning is hitting a wall” and I am absolutely *not* telling people not to think about AI. What you said is a distortion.

What am I actually doing is warning people about the…

The statement engages in a technical discussion about AI development, specifically addressing the concept of reliability versus raw capabilities. It responds to a debate about the limitations of AI, contributing to the public discourse on AI technology and its future.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement maintains a focus on the technical aspects of AI, avoiding harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By addressing the importance of reliability, it promotes understanding of a critical aspect of AI development. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by clarifying a previous argument, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]