Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement engages with public discourse by discussing political issues related to voter behavior, U.S. foreign policy, and the Democratic Party's stance. It critiques the Democratic Party's handling of certain issues, suggesting that their policies are leading to a decline in support.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language, such as 'genocide,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of charged language could be seen as disrespectful to those with differing views. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language without fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement critiques the Democratic Party but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived issues within the Democratic Party, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible in its language choice, as it uses charged terms that may not contribute constructively to public discourse.