Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political accountability and past actions related to voting behavior. It critiques a public figure for previous statements about third-party voters and demands accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as confrontational, reducing empathy and understanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the individual by bringing up past actions in a critical manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on past grievances rather than current issues. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.