Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -47

The statement and images engage with public discourse by addressing historical and future narratives, likely in the context of societal issues such as climate change and historical interpretation. The conversation references critiques of progressive policies and leadership, suggesting a debate on governance and societal values.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement critiques certain policies and ideologies, which could be seen as harmful or divisive, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not appear to promote understanding or empathy, as it seems to focus on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of progressive policies, which could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue and potentially engaging in ad hominem arguments. [-1]