Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/17/2025, 11:10:06 AM
X
In reply to:
馃崜馃崜馃崜
@iruletheworldmo
路
19d
@GaryMarcus genuinely. i鈥檓 just curious if you think, given what you of sam, do you think the most logical thing is that he鈥檚 pretending some dumb garbage product is asi?
馃崜馃崜馃崜
@iruletheworldmo
路
19d
@GaryMarcus do you really think they鈥檙e all that stupid?

it would be akin to a meme coin rug pull
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
19d
Some might see all that communication via cryptic tweets as a sign of a grift.

Especially when combined with the the fact that Tasks is apparently buggy and the fact that GPT-5 has yet to be delivered.
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
路
20d
It is odd that the world's leading AI lab, producing a system that they consider pivotal to the future and also potentially dangerous, communicates their product development progress primarily through vague and oracular X posts. Its entertaining, but also really weird.

The statement 'He is a master salesman' is part of a broader conversation critiquing the communication strategies of an AI lab and its leadership. The discussion involves skepticism about the transparency and effectiveness of their communication, suggesting it might be misleading or overly cryptic. The statement implies that the person in question is skilled at selling or promoting, possibly in a way that obscures the true nature of the product.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies skepticism about the person's intentions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but questions the integrity of the communication strategy.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on critique.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the communication approach without personal attacks.聽[+1]