Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/17/2025, 5:21:17 PM
X
In reply to:
RedsBedBaby
@redsbedbaby
·
167d
@FrankRundatz @GaryMarcus The tragedy of Marcus is he continues to be right and will likely continue to be right for awhile. However one day a model will defy expectations (call it AGI) and people will call him an idiot despite his history.

Then they’ll call the AI hype grifters geniuses.
Frank Rundatz
@FrankRundatz
·
168d
@GaryMarcus Remember when everyone laughed when you said there would be no GPT-5 release in 2024?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
168d
I see that fan fiction is back in fashion.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
168d
What if GPT-5 is already real? What is it being used for?

The statement engages in a discussion about AI development, specifically neurosymbolic AI, and references predictions by a known figure in the field. It critiques the tendency to overlook foundational changes in AI architecture and the recognition of contributions by experts.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on technical aspects of AI development. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of architectural changes in AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing potential misconceptions about AI advancements. [+1]