Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47

Score -58

-6

The mainstream story about Joe Biden has long been that he would bring “adult supervision or gravitas” to political life, notes investigative journalist Peter Schweizer. As someone who had served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden ostensibly offered a “greater…

1/18/2025, 5:19:00 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

92d

Biden has been unable to perform the basic functions of a president, the media finally admits. But his real legacy remains his unprecedented influence peddling, which routed tens of millions from America's adversaries, including China, to his family, undermining national security

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the performance and alleged actions of a public figure, Joe Biden, in the context of national security and political integrity. It presents a critical view of Biden's presidency and suggests involvement in influence peddling, which are significant public issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement could potentially cause harm by making serious allegations without providing evidence in the text, which may mislead or misinform the public. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not respect privacy and dignity, as it makes unverified claims about Biden's actions and intentions. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging counterarguments or evidence. [-2]