The statement raises concerns about transparency and ethical practices by OpenAI regarding the FrontierMath benchmark. It questions OpenAI's openness and suggests potential misleading of contributors, which are significant public issues.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by lack of transparency, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of the mathematicians by not naming them, but it challenges OpenAI's actions, which could be seen as a violation of transparency. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and accountability by bringing attention to the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.