The statement and its context involve a critical discussion about transparency and data access in AI research, specifically regarding OpenAI's results on FrontierMath. It raises concerns about the integrity of reported results due to potential conflicts of interest and lack of transparency, which are significant public issues in the field of AI ethics and research integrity.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm due to lack of transparency.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for transparency and independent validation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism, questioning the validity of results without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the need for transparency and suggests improvements, aligning with acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for better transparency in AI research, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning practices in AI research. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.