The statement criticizes OpenAI for allegedly manipulating the benchmark process and lacking transparency, suggesting that competitors are unfairly disadvantaged. The tone is accusatory and expresses frustration.
- The statement could potentially harm OpenAI's reputation by accusing them of unethical practices, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions OpenAI's transparency and integrity, which could be seen as a violation of respecting the privacy and dignity of others if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes strong accusations, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.