In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4d
The statement raises concerns about fairness and transparency in AI benchmarking, specifically regarding OpenAI's access to FrontierMath. It questions whether OpenAI has an unfair advantage and suggests a lack of transparency in the process.
- The statement highlights potential harm in terms of unfair competition, suggesting OpenAI may have an undue advantage. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the transparency of OpenAI's actions, implying a lack of respect for fair competition and privacy of competitors. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by clarifying the situation and raising awareness about potential issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.