In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
91d
The statement expresses a strong opinion against wind energy, accusing its proponents of being 'depraved' and 'fake.' It celebrates a political decision as a victory for environmental conservation, specifically for the North Atlantic right whale. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, targeting specific groups and individuals.
- The statement uses charged language that could be considered harmful, such as 'depraved' and 'fake journalists,' which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The accusatory tone and labeling of groups as 'green sell-outs' and 'fake journalists' could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful to the dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses divisive language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks against groups and individuals. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.