Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 99
Reposted by Gary Marcus
Delip Rao e/σ
@deliprao
·
1d
This is absolutely wild. OpenAI had access to all of FrontierMath data from the beginning. Anyone who knows ML will tell you don’t need to explicitly use the data in your training set (although there is no guarantee of that it did not happen here) to contaminate your model.

I…
1/19/2025, 3:17:43 PM
X

The statement expresses skepticism and criticism towards OpenAI's handling of data transparency, suggesting fraudulent behavior. It reflects frustration and distrust, likely aiming to provoke discussion about ethical practices in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it accuses OpenAI of fraud without providing evidence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone rather than fostering understanding or discussion. [-2]