In reply to:
Robert Costa
@costareports
·
21h
The statement and its context involve a discussion about Gen. Mark Milley's concerns regarding former President Donald Trump's actions and the potential for a right-wing coup, as documented in books by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, particularly regarding national security and political stability, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses concerns about potential harm related to national security.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and documented events.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the events surrounding January 6 and the actions taken by Gen. Milley. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing documented concerns and actions without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public about significant historical events and concerns. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing public figures and events. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.