In reply to:
Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh
@S_OhEigeartaigh
·
4h
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4h
The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and its definitions, involving a discussion among experts and commentators in the field. The tone is analytical and critical, focusing on the shifting definitions of AGI and the implications for public understanding.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is focused on a technical discussion about AGI definitions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about the definitions and expectations of AGI, which is a complex topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the shifts in AGI definitions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.