In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
131d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about government censorship and free speech, suggesting that the government has overstepped constitutional boundaries. It implies a critique of government actions and policies related to misinformation and free speech.
- The statement suggests harm by accusing the government of infringing on constitutional rights, which could incite fear or distrust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of public figures by implying they support censorship for ulterior motives. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead framing the issue as a conflict between the government and citizens. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government actions but does so in a manner that could be seen as accusatory rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.