In reply to:
@Slolum23
@Slolum23
·
16d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
16d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the nature of the United States' political system, addressing the debate between being a constitutional republic and a democracy. It challenges the notion that these terms are mutually exclusive and suggests that both can coexist.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does use the term 'propaganda' which could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does dismiss the opposing view as 'propaganda,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the coexistence of a republic and democracy, but it could do so in a more empathetic manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue but dismisses the opposing view as 'propaganda,' which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate about political systems, but it could use a more respectful tone to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.