The statement addresses a public issue concerning AI safety and policy, referencing the rescission of an executive order and mentioning a public figure's concerns. It carries a tone of disappointment and critique.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a public figure's stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more critical in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a significant policy change, which can be seen as contributing to public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to comment on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.