Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
1/22/2025, 5:02:25 AM
X
In reply to:
Brent
@brentmulligan
·
173d
@shellenberger Seems about the list you’d get if you were just shouting out words you’d think will please the DEI trainer and you just wanted to be done.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
173d
The DEI trainers made the Lockheed Martin employees describe "white men" as racist and angry KKK members in the degrading fashion that cults have long used to strip individuals of their dignity and destroy their sense of self. Evil and illegal.
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
1509d
To begin, the diversity trainers led a “free association” exercise, asking the Lockheed employees to list connotations for the term “white men.” The trainers wrote down “old, racist, privileged, anti-women, angry, Aryan Nation, KKK, Founding fathers, guns, guilty, can’t jump.”
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
173d
US government contractors segregating and humiliating their employees through the use of racist and sexist stereotypes will go down as one of the worst moments in the Woke Reign of Terror. Bravo to @realchrisrufo for using it to dismantle structural racism, a.k.a. DEI.
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
1509d
SCOOP: @LockheedMartin, the nation’s largest defense contractor, sent key executives to a three-day white male reeducation camp in order to deconstruct their “white male culture” and atone for their “white male privilege.”

I've obtained internal documents that will shock you.🧵

The statement is part of a broader discussion on DEI training and its implications, which constitutes public discourse. The conversation critiques DEI practices, suggesting they are harmful and degrading.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by describing DEI training as degrading and evil, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the privacy and dignity of those involved in DEI training. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using strong negative language. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in strong negative rhetoric, which could be seen as a personal attack on DEI trainers. [-2]