Jake Tapper

The statement criticizes a decision by the President regarding security protection and calls for congressional action. It uses strong language and highlights a perceived threat from Iran, urging specific political leaders to act.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in political criticism that borders on personal attack.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on urging action rather than discussing solutions. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to call for political action, aiming to address a security concern. [+1]