In reply to:
Carl TheTruth Is Back
@SuckMyTweet17
·
16d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
16d
The statement engages in a discussion about U.S. laws and the role of federal employees, which is part of a broader conversation about immigration policies and the responsibilities of law enforcement officials. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses public issues related to governance and policy enforcement.
- The statement is neutral and factual, not causing harm with words or actions. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It responds factually to a point made in the conversation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.