Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a policy change within the Trump White House regarding staff interactions with members of Congress. It highlights a shift in guidelines that discourage drinking with Congress members, which is a departure from past administrations. This statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a policy change within a governmental context, potentially impacting public perceptions of governance and ethics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a factual report on a policy change. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It reports on a policy without targeting individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it provides information that could lead to discussions about ethical standards in government.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the policy change rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on a policy change, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, which can contribute to societal betterment by encouraging transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.