Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47

Score -202

-7

Be afraid of what will happen if our corrupt Intelligence Community is able to get a few pusillanimous and captured Senators to derail Tulsi Gabbard's nomination. Freedom-loving people everywhere need Gabbard as DNI to reign in our out-of-control IC.

1/23/2025, 5:32:07 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

172d

Tulsi Gabbard is a threat to national security, say Senators close to the Intelligence Community. She's not. She's a threat to the most corrupt people in the Intel Community. We must defend Gabbard's nomination as though our freedom depends on it, because it does.

The statement expresses a strong opinion on Tulsi Gabbard's nomination and criticizes the Intelligence Community and certain Senators. It uses charged language, suggesting a threat to freedom if Gabbard's nomination is derailed.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses fear-inducing language, which could be seen as harmful. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the dignity of the Senators mentioned, labeling them negatively. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on divisive rhetoric. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
It engages in personal attacks against Senators, rather than constructive criticism. [-2]