Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes GenAI advocates for allegedly promoting changes to copyright laws that would benefit AI development at the expense of creators' rights. It uses strong language, labeling such actions as 'theft' and a 'racket,' indicating a strong opposition to the proposed changes.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as disrespectful to those advocating for copyright changes, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses personal attacks and labels rather than addressing the issues substantively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.