Michael Schellenberger

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -56

The statement criticizes California's government for allegedly mismanaging funds, linking disaster aid to state reforms. It questions the allocation of resources and suggests a moral hazard in federal aid without accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about resource allocation, which could be seen as promoting accountability, but it also risks harm by potentially spreading unverified claims. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It criticizes public figures, which is common in political discourse, but should ensure accuracy to respect dignity and avoid misinformation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of public officials, which is part of healthy discourse, but should avoid personal attacks and ensure constructive dialogue.