The statement engages in public discourse by discussing a potential investigation into the intelligence community, which is a significant public issue. The tone is somewhat skeptical but anticipates that the investigation will yield important disclosures, regardless of the competence of the participants.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on the potential outcomes of an investigation.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that the investigation will be enlightening, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging potential incompetence but still valuing the outcome. It does not engage in personal attacks.
[+1]