In reply to:
Christian Szegedy
@ChrSzegedy
·
99d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the capabilities of AI compared to human abilities, contributing to the broader conversation about AI's impact on society. It suggests that despite AI's advancements, there are still many things humans can do that AI cannot, which can be seen as a reassurance against existential anxiety about AI's rapid progress.
- The statement does no harm and provides a reassuring perspective on AI's limitations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by highlighting the differences between human and AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages constructively in the dialogue about AI's impact without attacking others. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.