Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 73
1/24/2025, 11:42:26 PM
X
In reply to:
sebastian barros
@sebastianbarros
·
99d
@GaryMarcus And the wall? You keep changing your objections as we move along…..massive progress in the area shown by reasoning models that are cheaper due to optimize algos. You are betting against science
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
99d
Me, last March: we won’t see GPT-5 soon; instead many competitors will converge, there won’t be much moat. Instead, there will be a price war. Profits will be meager.

China, today: All that, and we raise you a 50x reduction in cost.

Still no GPT-5 but GenAI is now practically…
Deedy
@deedydas
·
100d
China just dropped a new model.
ByteDance Doubao-1.5-pro matches GPT 4o benchmarks at 50x cheaper

— $0.022/M cached input tokens, $0.11/M input, $0.275/M output
— 5x cheaper than DeepSeek, >200x of o1
— 32k + 256k context
— sparse MoE architecture

AI truly too cheap to meter.

The statement engages in a discussion about the progress and challenges in AI development, specifically addressing objections related to hallucinations, reasoning, compositionality, and reliability. It critiques the perceived inconsistency in objections raised against AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but critiques the consistency of objections, which could be seen as constructive.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but rather focuses on critiquing the consistency of objections.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing perceived inconsistencies in objections to AI progress. [+1]