Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 80
1/25/2025, 12:50:05 AM
X
In reply to:
mfarles
@mfarles
·
101d
@iruletheworldmo @GaryMarcus Absolutely nothing you're saying is true. Again. It really is possible to be even worse than blatant grifters. This is on par with true Altman level, without any of his benefits. Congrats! 😂
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
101d
@GaryMarcus o1 is gpt 5. it’s 10x better than 4. they just bagged half a trillion. are you ok sir?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
101d
Me, last March: we won’t see GPT-5 soon; instead many competitors will converge, there won’t be much moat. Instead, there will be a price war. Profits will be meager.

China, today: All that, and we raise you a 50x reduction in cost.

Still no GPT-5 but GenAI is now practically…
Deedy
@deedydas
·
102d
China just dropped a new model.
ByteDance Doubao-1.5-pro matches GPT 4o benchmarks at 50x cheaper

— $0.022/M cached input tokens, $0.11/M input, $0.275/M output
— 5x cheaper than DeepSeek, >200x of o1
— 32k + 256k context
— sparse MoE architecture

AI truly too cheap to meter.

The statement critiques a claim about AI advancements and financial figures, aiming to correct misinformation. It uses a factual tone to address inaccuracies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to correct misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, maintaining respect for others. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing inaccuracies without personal attacks. [+1]