Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques OpenAI for not releasing an unrestricted, open-weight model and praises DeepSeek for doing so. It suggests that OpenAI missed an opportunity to make a historical impact. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses strong language that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but criticizes OpenAI's actions, which could be seen as undermining their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on shaming OpenAI. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.